为什么kernel-headers 和 kernel的版本不一样

lanzinc

[root@206studio proc]# pacman -Q | grep kernel
kernel-headers 2.6.12.0-1
kernel26 2.6.17.11-1

为什么kernel-headers 和 kernel的版本不一样？

seamonkey

For years it has been common practice to use “raw” kernel headers (straight from a kernel tarball) in /usr/include, but over the last few years, the kernel developers have taken a strong stance that this should not be done. This gave birth to the Linux-Libc-Headers Project, which was designed to maintain an API stable version of the Linux headers.

http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/doc/FAQ

d00m3d

这是出自 LFS 手册的吧

For years it has been common practice to use “raw” kernel headers (straight from a kernel tarball) in /usr/include, but over the last few years, the kernel developers have taken a strong stance that this should not be done. This gave birth to the Linux-Libc-Headers Project, which was designed to maintain an API stable version of the Linux headers.

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ ... x-libc-headers.html

可是 Linux-Libc-Headers Project 寿终正寝了，现在各大发行版开始自行去"净化"内核的头文件了

http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/x86/final-system/linux-headers.html

相关讨论：
http://www.linuxsir.cn/bbs/showthread.php?t=260766

seamonkey

老兄对LFS真是熟:cool:

今天困了，明天就这个话题可能还有些问题。